Async video messaging for teams — record screen, camera, and voice instantly
Loom is the leading async video messaging platform, enabling teams to record screen, webcam, and microphone simultaneously and share a link instantly — replacing slow back-and-forth emails and unnecessary meetings. Its viewer engagement features (emoji reactions, comments, chapters, call-to-action buttons) and deep integrations with Slack, Notion, Jira, and GitHub make it the default async communication tool at over 200,000 companies.
Loom is a strong fit if its core strengths match your workflow, budget, and support needs. Use the quick signals below before opening the full review.
Loom's dominance in async video messaging comes from one obsession: minimising the time between 'I want to record this' and 'the link is in the Slack thread.' The browser extension records desktop, tab, or camera with one click, uploads automatically, and copies the shareable URL to clipboard before the recording window even closes. For teams that communicate primarily via text, Loom's low-friction video sharing eliminates the translation loss that written descriptions of visual problems inevitably produce.
Loom is optimised for replacing synchronous communication — meetings, calls, and real-time screen shares — with recorded equivalents that recipients watch on their own schedule. A 3-minute Loom explaining a design decision conveys what a 1-paragraph Slack message cannot: tone, nuance, screen context, and facial expression. Viewer analytics show who watched, how far they got, and whether they rewatched sections — feedback that text messages do not provide.
Loom's viewer experience turns recordings into interactive communication. Viewers leave timestamped comments at specific moments, react with emojis, and click embedded call-to-action buttons. Senders see engagement metrics. The auto-generated transcript is searchable and allows viewers to jump to specific moments by keyword — eliminating the need to scrub through recordings to find relevant sections.
Loom's editing is intentionally minimal: trim start/end, add chapters, and stitch clips. Teams needing polished tutorial production, cursor highlighting, annotations, or quiz embeds should use Camtasia or ScreenFlow for production and Loom for quick async sharing.
Score: 9.2/10 — Best async video messaging platform; editing depth and free tier limits are the honest constraints.
Free
Free billed annually
$15/mo
$150/mo billed annually
$20/mo
$200/mo billed annually
Loom is best for Remote and distributed teams replacing recurring meetings with async video updates and walkthroughs, Engineering and product teams sharing bug reports, code reviews, and feature demos with annotated screen recordings, Customer success teams creating personalised video responses to client questions at scale.
Yes. Loom currently lists a free plan in ToolRankr data.
It has a free plan.
Loom is reviewed using ToolRankr's scoring model for ease of use, value, features, support, and overall quality. Affiliate links may earn a commission, but sponsored labels do not change editorial scoring.
Get major pricing, feature, and ranking changes for tools you care about.
